Overview

Lancaster Court Hotel

202-204 Sussex Gardens, London, W2 3UA, United Kingdom
+44 207 402 8438

₹ 3,827+

Overall guest ratings

6.4/10 Good
based on 2,144 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.6
  • 4.1
  • 3.6
  • 3.3

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in London City Centre, this hotel is within a 15-minute walk of Kensington Gardens and Hyde Park. Selfridges and Royal Albert Hall are also within 1 mi (2 km).

    Less more
    Expedia

    Amenities

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Express check out
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Storage available
    • Concierge service
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews of Lancaster Court Hotel

    Overall rating

    6.4 Good
    based on 2,144 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.7 "City centre within easy reach, said 97%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 87%."
    • 8.5 "Great service."
      9.3 "93% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.1 "81% said the reception staff was great."
      7.8 "Housekeeping was great, according to 78%."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      4.0 "60% complained about the bathroom."
      1.2 "88% said rooms were small."
      2.1 "79% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.7 "83% found problems with the furniture."
      4.1 "59% had problems with the shower."
      3.9 "For 61%, the rooms looked old."
      1.2 "88% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.0 "60% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      4.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 57%."
    • 3.6 "Internet is poor."
      3.2 "68% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.1 "59% complained about the elevator."
      0.4 "For 96%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      2.3 "77% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.0 "100% didn't like the architecture."
    • 3.1 "Awful breakfast."

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 793 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 96%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.6 "76% said the reception staff was great."
      7.8 "Housekeeping was great, according to 78%."
    • 3.9 "Rooms are not good."
      1.0 "90% said rooms were small."
      1.9 "81% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.7 "For 63%, the rooms looked old."
      4.0 "60% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% found problems with the furniture."
      0.9 "91% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 61%."
      3.9 "61% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
      3.1 "69% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.1 "59% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% didn't like the architecture."
      1.9 "81% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.6 "Awful breakfast."

    Overall rating

    6.4 Good
    based on 728 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.4 "Great service."
      9.4 "94% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.2 "82% said the reception staff was great."
      7.2 "Housekeeping was great, according to 72%."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      3.7 "63% complained about the bathroom."
      1.3 "87% said rooms were small."
      2.4 "76% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.3 "87% found problems with the furniture."
      3.5 "For 65%, the rooms looked old."
      1.1 "89% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.1 "59% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      4.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 51%."
    • 3.7 "Internet is poor."
      3.3 "67% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.4 "Breakfast is below average."

    Overall rating

    5.7 OK
    based on 21 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."

    Overall rating

    6.4 Good
    based on 600 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "98% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.5 "Great service."
      9.4 "94% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.1 "81% said the reception staff was great."
      7.1 "71% thought the service was very professional."
      7.7 "Housekeeping was great, according to 77%."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      4.3 "57% complained about the bathroom."
      1.8 "82% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
      4.0 "60% had problems with the shower."
      1.6 "84% found problems with the furniture."
      3.8 "For 62%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.9 "Internet is poor."
      3.4 "66% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.3 "57% complained about the elevator."
      2.3 "77% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.9 "Awful breakfast."
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    more
    more

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close