Overview

Muangphol Mansion

931/9 Soi Kaseamsaan 1, Rama 1 Rd. Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
+66 2 219 4445

₹ 1,820+

Overall guest ratings

6.9/10 Good
based on 1,327 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.8
  • 5.5
  • 4.2
  • 4.1

Good to know

  • Great shopping

Nearby

    show all

    Amenities

    • Internet
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 1,327 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.9 "City centre within easy reach, said 89%."
    • 5.5 "Internet is average."
    • 5.4 "Service is ok."
      5.5 "Only 55% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      6.1 "Only 61% thought the service was professional."
    • 4.2 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.1 "Not very comfortable."
      3.1 "69% thought it was too noisy."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
      0.9 "91% had problems with the shower."
      2.0 "80% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.2 "78% found problems with the furniture."
      2.8 "72% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.0 "100% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 2.4 "Terrible amenities."
      2.0 "80% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.9 "For 91%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.6 "94% didn't like the architecture."
    • 1.1 "Horrible vibe."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.9 "71% criticized the plain hotel."
      0.9 "For 91%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      1.7 "83% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 650 reviews
    • 10.0 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 5.9 "Internet is average."
    • 5.4 "Food is average."
    • 4.8 "Service is below average."
      3.8 "62% indicated the reception staff was not good."
    • 3.4 "Not very comfortable."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% thought it was too noisy."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      1.0 "90% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% found problems with the furniture."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
      2.1 "79% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.6 "Terrible amenities."
      2.2 "78% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.2 "98% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.0 "Horrible vibe."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 265 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
    • 5.6 "Service is ok."
      5.1 "Only 51% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 3.7 "Not very comfortable."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
      2.7 "73% thought it was too noisy."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      0.4 "96% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.9 "91% had problems with the shower."
    • 2.2 "Terrible amenities."
      1.7 "83% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.0 "Horrible vibe."
      0.4 "96% criticized the unstylish hotel."

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 26 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 5.4 "Service is ok."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 384 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 5.8 "Service is ok."
      5.6 "Only 56% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.4 "Internet is average."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      0.1 "For 99%, the rooms looked old."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were small."
      1.0 "90% had problems with the shower."
    • 2.2 "Terrible amenities."
      1.8 "82% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.1 "Horrible vibe."
      0.4 "96% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Great shopping"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close