Overview

Ryokan Ohto

Hitosujime-minami-sagaru Nanajo-Kamogawa-higashi Higashiyama, Kyoto 605-0994, Japan
+81 755 417 803

₹ 2,580+

Overall guest ratings

5.3/10 OK
based on 954 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.2
  • 5.8
  • 3.4
  • 3.3

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in Higashiyama, this ryokan is within a 15-minute walk of Sanjusangendo Temple, Kyoto Tower, and Higashi Honganji Temple. Kiyomizu Temple and Gion Corner are also within 2 mi (3 km).

    Less more
    Expedia

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Parking
    • Air-conditioned
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry facilities
    • Laundry service
    • Pets not allowed
    • Terrace/Patio
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    5.3 OK
    based on 954 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.6 "96% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.3 "Easily accessible by car, said 93%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.2 "92% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 5.8 "Internet is average."
      5.2 "52% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 5.5 "Food is average."
    • 5.0 "Average value."
    • 3.4 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      1.7 "For 83%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.3 "Service is below average."
      4.9 "51% found the staff to be unfriendly."
      4.5 "55% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      3.3 "67% didn't like the management."
      1.7 "Bad housekeeping, according to 83%."
      3.6 "64% thought the service was unprofessional."
      1.7 "Hotel security was horrible, thought 83%."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      1.4 "86% said rooms were dirty."
      2.2 "78% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.9 "For 91%, the rooms looked old."
      1.0 "90% said the bathroom was dirty."
      4.1 "59% had problems with the shower."
      1.0 "90% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.1 "Awful breakfast."
    • 3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.2 "78% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      4.6 "54% thought it was too noisy."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    5.1 OK
    based on 467 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.6 "96% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.3 "93% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 6.0 "Internet is average."
      5.4 "54% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 4.8 "Value below average."
    • 3.6 "Service is below average."
      4.9 "51% found the staff to be unfriendly."
      4.5 "55% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the management."
      3.5 "65% thought the service was unprofessional."
      1.7 "Bad housekeeping, according to 83%."
    • 3.5 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.4 "86% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.4 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      1.2 "88% said rooms were dirty."
      2.2 "78% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.3 "For 87%, the rooms looked old."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    5.0 OK
    based on 248 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "97% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.1 "Easily accessible by car, said 91%."
    • 5.4 "Average value."
    • 3.6 "Service is below average."
      4.8 "52% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      3.9 "61% thought the service was unprofessional."
      1.9 "Bad housekeeping, according to 81%."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the management."
    • 3.2 "Horrible vibe."
      0.9 "91% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.4 "56% complained about the elevator."
    • 2.9 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.9 "81% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.8 "52% thought it was too noisy."
    • 2.9 "Awful rooms."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      1.9 "81% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.3 "87% said rooms were dirty."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.6 "94% thought they were poorly maintained."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    5.7 OK
    based on 238 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.6 "96% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 6.0 "Internet is average."
    • 5.5 "Average value."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      1.7 "83% said rooms were dirty."
      2.3 "77% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.0 "90% found problems with the furniture."
      1.1 "For 89%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.4 "Service is below average."
      5.0 "50% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 3.3 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.6 "64% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.0 "80% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 3.1 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.3 "77% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      4.9 "51% thought it was too noisy."
    View all review categories
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map