Hotel Marconi, Venice Hotels from ₹ 7,812

Guest reviews

based on 1,107 reviews

Location

9.6 "Terrific location."

9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."

10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."

9.2 "Near to public transport, according to 92%."

10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."

8.9 "89% liked the proximity to shopping."
Breakfast

7.5 "Good breakfast."

10.0 "100% were happy with the price of the breakfast."
Service

7.4 "Good service."

7.6 "76% found the staff to be very friendly."

9.4 "Housekeeping was great, according to 94%."
Room

5.1 "Rooms are ok."

5.8 "Beds were acceptable for 58%."

7.0 "70% thought the view was good."

5.3 "53% thought the bathroom was big enough."
Comfort

4.1 "Not very comfortable."

3.3 "67% said rooms were small."

3.2 "68% thought it was too noisy."

4.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 59%."
Vibe

3.4 "Vibe wasn't good."

1.5 "85% criticized the unstylish hotel."

4.4 "56% didn't like the unstylish hotel."

1.6 "For 84%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
Amenities

3.4 "Bad amenities."

3.5 "65% thought the building wasn't nice."

3.9 "61% complained about the elevator."

0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."

1.6 "For 84%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."

2.7 "73% didn't like the architecture."
WiFi

2.9 "Disappointing internet connection."

2.5 "75% said the wifi quality was bad."

View all review categories

based on 476 reviews

Location

9.6 "Terrific location."

9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
Breakfast

7.6 "Good breakfast."
Service

7.4 "Good service."

7.4 "74% found the staff to be very friendly."

8.7 "87% thought the service was very professional."
Value for money

6.5 "Average value."
Room

4.9 "Rooms are not good."

3.5 "65% said rooms were small."

3.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 65%."

3.7 "63% found problems with the furniture."

2.1 "For 79%, the rooms looked old."

1.8 "82% thought they were poorly maintained."
Comfort

4.1 "Not very comfortable."

3.0 "70% thought it was too noisy."

3.5 "65% said rooms were small."

3.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 65%."
Vibe

3.3 "Vibe wasn't good."

1.3 "87% criticized the unstylish hotel."

4.3 "57% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
Amenities

3.3 "Bad amenities."

3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."

3.8 "62% complained about the elevator."

0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
WiFi

2.9 "Disappointing internet connection."

2.4 "76% said the wifi quality was bad."

View all review categories

based on 597 reviews

Location

9.5 "Terrific location."

9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."

9.4 "Near to public transport, according to 94%."

10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
Breakfast

7.3 "Good breakfast."
Service

7.1 "Good service."

7.5 "75% found the staff to be very friendly."

8.0 "80% thought the service was very professional."

9.2 "Housekeeping was great, according to 92%."
Value for money

6.5 "Average value."
Room

5.5 "Rooms are ok."

6.3 "Beds were acceptable for 63%."
Comfort

4.4 "Not very comfortable."

3.2 "68% said rooms were small."

3.3 "67% thought it was too noisy."

4.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 60%."
Amenities

3.4 "Bad amenities."

3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."

4.0 "60% complained about the elevator."

0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
Vibe

3.2 "Horrible vibe."

1.4 "86% criticized the unstylish hotel."

4.6 "54% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
WiFi

3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."

2.7 "73% said the wifi quality was bad."

View all review categories

based on 33 reviews

Location

9.7 "Terrific location."
Service

7.3 "Good service."

7.6 "76% found the staff to be very friendly."
Breakfast

7.3 "Good breakfast."
Room

4.9 "Rooms are not good."
Comfort

4.1 "Not very comfortable."
Amenities

3.6 "Bad amenities."