Overview

King Royal Garden Inn

245 South Sathorn Road, Yannawa, Sathorn, Bangkok, Thailand
+66 2 675 8120

₹ 1,610+

Overall guest ratings

6.9/10 Good
based on 1,612 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.0
  • 6.6
  • 4.3
  • 3.4

Good to know

  • Spacious rooms

Nearby

    show all

    About

    At King Royal Garden Inn, you'll be within a 10-minute drive of Patpong Night Market and Lumpini Park. Guests can grab a bite to eat at the restaurant and visit the fitness center for a workout. Other highlights include an outdoor pool, and rooms offer deep soaking tubs and refrigerators.

    Less more
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Fitness centre
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • ATM on-site
    • Internet
    • Laundry service
    • Spa
    • Indoor pool
    • Outdoor pool
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Business centre
    • Concierge service
    • Beauty salon
    • Pets not allowed
    • Designated smoking area
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 1,612 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.4 "Easily accessible by car, said 84%."
      8.8 "88% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 6.6 "Service is ok."
      5.8 "58% said the reception staff was ok."
      6.1 "Only 61% thought the service was professional."
      6.4 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 64%."
    • 6.2 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.2 "Rooms are ok."
      6.3 "Beds were acceptable for 63%."
    • 4.3 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the fitness area."
    • 3.4 "Internet is poor."
      3.4 "66% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.0 "80% thought it was rather dirty."
      2.6 "Dirty pool, said 74%."
    • 2.3 "Horrible vibe."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      0.8 "For 92%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      4.0 "60% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 902 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      9.5 "95% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 86%."
    • 6.5 "Service is ok."
      5.6 "56% said the reception staff was ok."
      6.4 "Only 64% thought the service was professional."
    • 6.4 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.6 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 4.9 "Rooms are not good."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      2.1 "79% complained about the bathroom."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.7 "For 73%, the rooms looked old."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.9 "81% had problems with the shower."
      2.2 "78% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.3 "77% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.3 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the fitness area."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
      3.5 "65% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.9 "81% thought it was rather dirty."
      2.6 "Dirty pool, said 74%."
    • 2.3 "Horrible vibe."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 241 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
    • 7.4 "High comfort."
      8.7 "87% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 6.8 "Service is ok."
    • 6.0 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.4 "Rooms are ok."
      6.2 "Beds were acceptable for 62%."
    • 5.2 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 4.6 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
      3.8 "62% didn't like the fitness area."
    • 3.4 "Internet is poor."
      3.4 "66% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.9 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were dirty."
      0.6 "94% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.4 "Horrible vibe."
      1.8 "82% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 32 reviews
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
    • 8.6 "Good value."
    • 7.6 "High comfort."
    • 7.0 "Good service."
    • 6.3 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.2 "Rooms are ok."

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 435 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.1 "Easily accessible by car, said 81%."
      9.2 "92% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.9 "High comfort."
      8.9 "89% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 7.0 "Good service."
      6.2 "Only 62% thought the service was professional."
      6.0 "60% said the reception staff was ok."
      6.3 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 63%."
    • 5.6 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.6 "Rooms are ok."
      6.8 "Beds were acceptable for 68%."
    • 4.2 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
    • 3.3 "Internet is poor."
      3.3 "67% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      0.6 "94% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.0 "80% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 2.1 "Horrible vibe."
      1.4 "86% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Spacious rooms"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews


    Photos
    Map

    Map