Overview

Jacksons Motor Inn

373 Glen Osmond Road, Glen Osmond, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia
+61 883 791 601

₹ 3,423+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
based on 1,185 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.6
  • 8.4
  • 4.8
  • 3.7

Nearby

    show all

    About

    When you stay at Jacksons Motor Inn, you'll be within a 15-minute drive of National Wine Centre of Australia and Adelaide Central Market. Guests can splash around at the outdoor pool or grab a bite to eat at the restaurant. Other highlights include a children's pool and a garden, and rooms offer refrigerators and free WiFi.

    Less more
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Parking
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Internet
    • Outdoor pool
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Business centre
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry facilities
    • Child pool
    • Grill
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 1,185 reviews
    • 9.6 "Excellent value."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      9.1 "City centre within easy reach, said 91%."
      8.1 "81% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% thought parking was inexpensive."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      9.4 "94% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.0 "80% said the reception staff was great."
      10.0 "100% thought the service was very professional."
      8.3 "Management was excellent, said 83%."
    • 7.3 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.9 "Sufficient wellness & sports facilities."
    • 4.8 "Not very comfortable."
      3.3 "67% thought it was too noisy."
      3.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 70%."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were dirty."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      0.4 "96% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.2 "For 78%, the rooms looked old."
      3.1 "69% had problems with the shower."
      2.6 "74% found problems with the furniture."
      3.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 70%."
      1.6 "84% were disappointed with the minibar."
      3.3 "67% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
      2.4 "76% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.9 "71% found the grounds unpleasant."
      0.4 "96% didn't like the architecture."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.0 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were dirty."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.3 "67% thought it was rather dirty."
      2.0 "80% said that wellness & sports facilities were unclean."
      1.5 "Dirty pool, said 85%."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 592 reviews
    • 9.4 "Excellent value."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      9.4 "94% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.1 "81% said the reception staff was great."
    • 8.2 "Location is great."
      9.2 "City centre within easy reach, said 92%."
    • 7.3 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.5 "Not very comfortable."
      4.9 "51% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% thought it was too noisy."
      3.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 68%."
    • 4.0 "Internet is poor."
      2.5 "75% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were dirty."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      4.9 "51% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.2 "68% had problems with the shower."
      1.8 "82% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.2 "For 78%, the rooms looked old."
      3.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 68%."
      2.5 "75% found problems with the furniture."
      1.6 "84% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.5 "65% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.8 "72% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 3.2 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were dirty."
      1.8 "82% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.7 "63% thought it was rather dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 355 reviews
    • 7.9 "Good location."
      8.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 88%."
    • 7.8 "Good service."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.8 "78% said the reception staff was great."
    • 5.0 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 4.5 "Not very comfortable."
      2.8 "72% thought it was too noisy."
      2.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 72%."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were dirty."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      1.3 "87% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.2 "78% found problems with the furniture."
      3.0 "70% had problems with the shower."
      2.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 72%."
      1.9 "For 81%, the rooms looked old."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 2.3 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were dirty."
      1.3 "87% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 237 reviews
    • 9.6 "Excellent value."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 5.2 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 4.8 "Not very comfortable."
      3.4 "66% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.7 "Bad amenities."
      3.8 "62% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      1.9 "For 81%, the rooms looked old."
      2.9 "71% had problems with the shower."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.1 "Horrible vibe."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.0 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.7 "73% said rooms were dirty."
      3.8 "62% thought it was rather dirty."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Economy Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for budget travelers.
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    more
    more

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close