Overview

The Strand Hotel

via Tuscolana, 892, 00174 Rome, Lazio, Italy
+39 067 696 9978

₹ 4,186+

Overall guest ratings

6.7/10 Good
based on 596 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.4
  • 7.2
  • 4.8
  • 4.2

Good to know

  • Close to public transport

Nearby

    show all

    About

    The Strand Hotel features a rooftop terrace and puts you 3.1 mi (4.9 km) from Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterano and 5.6 mi (9.1 km) from Roman Forum. After splashing around at the seasonal outdoor pool, you can unwind with a drink at the pool bar. There's also a garden, and rooms offer flat-screen TVs and refrigerators.

    Less more
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Business centre
    • Internet
    • Concierge service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Outdoor pool
    • No smoking
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 596 reviews
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 7.2 "Good service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.4 "Average value."
    • 5.6 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 5.0 "Food is average."
    • 4.8 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% thought it was too noisy."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
      1.7 "83% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      1.7 "83% complained about the bathroom."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were small."
      1.5 "85% had problems with the shower."
      3.3 "67% found problems with the furniture."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
      1.7 "83% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.1 "69% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.4 "86% were disappointed with the minibar."
      1.7 "83% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.4 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      3.1 "69% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.0 "Dirty pool, said 100%."
    • 3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      3.5 "65% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 417 reviews
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 7.2 "Good service."
      9.6 "96% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.3 "Average value."
    • 5.8 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 5.2 "Sufficient wellness & sports facilities."
    • 4.7 "Disappointing food."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
      2.0 "80% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.7 "73% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "86% had problems with the shower."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
      2.0 "80% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.6 "64% found problems with the furniture."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.0 "Dirty pool, said 100%."
    • 3.3 "Internet is poor."
      3.7 "63% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 95 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.2 "72% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.3 "Average value."
    • 5.4 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 4.6 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
    • 3.9 "Not very clean."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 2.7 "Awful breakfast."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 83 reviews
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 7.3 "Good service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.5 "Average value."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were small."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were small."
    • 3.4 "Not very clean."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.2 "Awful breakfast."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Good to know
    "Close to public transport"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:
    more
    more

    Photos
    Map

    Map