Overview

Linné Hostel

Vegagatan 22, 413 09 Gothenburg, Vastra Gotaland, Sweden
+46 3112 1060

₹ 2,824+

Overall guest ratings

7.1/10 Good
based on 1,472 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.1
  • 7.4
  • 4.8
  • 4.4

Good to know

  • Close to public transport

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Linné Hostel is located within the Linnéstaden district of central Gothenburg. It offers a communal kitchen with a stove and a fridge, free WiFi and free afternoon coffee and cookies. All rooms at Linné Hostel are simply furnished and include access to shared bathroom facilities. Many rooms have a TV. The surrounding neighbourhood provides a wide variety of restaurants and nightlife options. Gothenburg Central Station is an 11-minute direct bus ride away. Gothenburg Botanical Gardens is 0.9 miles away.

    Less more
    booking.com

    Amenities

    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Parking
    • Storage available
    • Free Wi-Fi
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 1,472 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      8.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 88%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 7.4 "Good service."
      9.6 "96% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.4 "Housekeeping was great, according to 74%."
      7.7 "77% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.2 "Average cleanliness."
      5.8 "Only 58% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 5.3 "Internet is average."
    • 4.8 "Bad amenities."
      4.6 "54% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 4.4 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.6 "64% complained about the bathroom."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      4.3 "57% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.6 "84% found problems with the furniture."
      2.7 "73% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      4.6 "54% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.2 "78% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.4 "86% were disappointed with the minibar."
      0.0 "For 100%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.9 "Not very comfortable."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      3.3 "67% thought it was too noisy."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      2.2 "78% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.2 "Horrible vibe."
      0.0 "100% criticized the plain hotel."
      4.6 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 54%."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 471 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
    • 7.3 "Good service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 5.3 "Internet is average."
    • 4.5 "Bad amenities."
      4.3 "57% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.7 "63% complained about the bathroom."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were small."
      1.6 "84% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were small."
      3.0 "70% thought it was too noisy."

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 471 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      7.2 "Great parking, according to 72%."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      9.5 "95% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.8 "Housekeeping was great, according to 78%."
    • 5.5 "Average cleanliness."
      5.0 "Only 50% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 4.8 "Bad amenities."
      4.5 "55% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      3.7 "63% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% complained about the bathroom."
      4.9 "51% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      2.5 "75% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.0 "60% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.8 "82% found problems with the furniture."
      4.5 "55% thought the tv was sub-standard."

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 529 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      8.7 "City centre within easy reach, said 87%."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.6 "96% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.5 "Average cleanliness."
      6.0 "Only 60% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 5.0 "Internet is average."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
      3.8 "62% complained about the bathroom."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.5 "55% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      1.6 "84% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% thought it was too noisy."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
    • 2.2 "Horrible vibe."
      4.3 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 57%."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Economy Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for budget travelers.
    Good to know
    "Close to public transport"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close