Overview

Golden Tulip Khatt Springs Resort & Spa

P.O. Box 16000, Ras Al Khaimah 16000, United Arab Emirates
+971 7244 8777

₹ 3,238+

Overall guest ratings

6.4/10 Good
based on 1,300 reviews

Review highlights

  • 6.6
  • 5.9
  • 4.7
  • 4.7

Nearby

    show all

    About

    A great choice for a stay in Digdaga, Golden Tulip Khatt Springs Resort & Spa features an airport shuttle (available on request) and a rooftop terrace. Guests can indulge in Ayurvedic treatments at the spa, and La Palmeraie serves breakfast, lunch, and dinner. A bar/lounge and a fitness center are other highlights, and rooms at this luxurious hotel offer balconies or patios and 24-hour room service.

    Less more
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Fitness centre
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Business centre
    • Car hire
    • Internet
    • Wi-Fi
    • Concierge service
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Gift shop
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Room service
    • Spa
    • Indoor pool
    • Outdoor pool
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Express check out
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Sauna
    • Free parking
    • Playground
    • Designated smoking area
    • Storage available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Fireplace
    • Laundry facilities
    • Game room
    • No smoking
    • Coffee shop
    • Babysitting/child care services (surcharge)
    • Free valet parking
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.4 Good
    based on 1,300 reviews
    • 6.6 "Sufficient wellness & sports facilities."
    • 5.9 "Location is acceptable."
    • 5.2 "Service is ok."
      5.0 "50% said the recreation staff was ok."
      5.5 "55% found the room service acceptable."
    • 5.1 "Rooms are ok."
      5.7 "Only 57% said rooms were clean enough."
      5.3 "Cleanliness of the bathroom was average, said 53%."
    • 4.7 "Value below average."
      4.4 "56% thought it was overpriced."
      0.9 "The price was too high for 91%."
    • 4.7 "Bad amenities."
      4.6 "54% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.1 "For 69%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 4.1 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.5 "85% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.1 "For 69%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.9 "Not very clean."
      1.2 "Dirty pool, said 88%."
      1.3 "87% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.6 "Disappointing food."
      2.8 "72% did not like what was on the menu."
      0.9 "The price was too high for 91%."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    based on 572 reviews
    • 6.1 "Location is acceptable."
    • 5.7 "Average comfort."
      6.6 "For only 66%, the noise level was all right."
    • 5.1 "Service is ok."
    • 4.9 "Bad amenities."
      4.9 "51% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 4.9 "Rooms are not good."
      3.8 "62% complained about the bathroom."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.5 "55% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 84%."
      1.0 "90% had problems with the shower."
      1.5 "For 85%, the rooms looked old."
    • 4.7 "Value below average."
      4.5 "55% thought it was overpriced."
    • 4.1 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.5 "85% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.0 "Not very clean."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.1 Good
    based on 663 reviews
    • 5.9 "Location is acceptable."
    • 5.7 "Average comfort."
      6.8 "For only 68%, the noise level was all right."
    • 4.9 "Service is below average."
      4.9 "51% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      3.5 "65% thought the service was unprofessional."
      3.8 "62% didn't like the management."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      3.9 "61% complained about the bathroom."
      4.4 "56% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.0 "80% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.4 "86% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "For 83%, the rooms looked old."
      1.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 84%."
    • 4.6 "Bad amenities."
      4.5 "55% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 4.3 "Value below average."
      4.3 "57% thought it was overpriced."
    • 3.9 "Vibe wasn't good."
      1.5 "85% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 65 reviews
    • 5.8 "Location is acceptable."
    • 5.6 "Service is ok."
    • 5.3 "Rooms are ok."
    • 4.7 "Value below average."
    • 3.9 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map