Overview

Pensao Nova Goa

Rua Arco Marques Do Alegrete, 13, 1100-034 Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
+351 218 881 137

₹ 2,465+

Overall guest ratings

7.2/10 Good
based on 2,210 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.6
  • 8.4
  • 4.6
  • 3.9

Nearby

    show all

    Amenities

    • ATM on-site
    • Car hire
    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Parking
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Free Wi-Fi
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 2,210 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.8 "88% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 8.4 "Great service."
      9.3 "93% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.8 "78% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.5 "Internet is average."
      6.0 "60% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 4.6 "Not very clean."
      4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."
      4.6 "54% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.9 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.3 "Not very comfortable."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      2.4 "76% thought it was too noisy."
      3.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 66%."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      2.6 "74% complained about the bathroom."
      3.5 "65% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      1.2 "88% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      0.4 "96% found problems with the furniture."
      4.6 "54% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 66%."
      1.6 "84% had problems with the shower."
      1.8 "82% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 2.4 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      2.4 "76% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% didn't like the architecture."
      2.0 "80% found the grounds unpleasant."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 1,171 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      7.9 "79% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.5 "Internet is average."
      6.1 "61% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 4.4 "Not very clean."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      4.3 "57% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.2 "Awful breakfast."
    • 2.9 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.0 "70% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "77% thought it was too noisy."
      3.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 68%."
    • 2.4 "Awful rooms."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      3.0 "70% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.4 "96% found problems with the furniture."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 68%."
      4.3 "57% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.3 "Terrible amenities."
      2.4 "76% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      2.5 "75% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 486 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      9.0 "90% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.3 "73% said the reception staff was great."
    • 6.7 "Internet is average."
    • 5.6 "Food is average."
      5.8 "Side dishes were satisfying, according to only 58%."
    • 4.0 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.0 "Not very clean."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      4.6 "54% thought it was rather dirty."
      4.5 "55% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.4 "Not very comfortable."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "77% thought it was too noisy."
      3.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 66%."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "86% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      0.5 "95% found problems with the furniture."
      3.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 66%."
      2.1 "79% had problems with the shower."
      4.5 "55% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.4 "Terrible amenities."
      2.6 "74% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.5 Good
    based on 552 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 9.0 "Excellent value."
    • 8.5 "Great service."
      9.3 "93% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.9 "79% said the reception staff was great."
      7.1 "Housekeeping was great, according to 71%."
      7.7 "77% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.7 "Internet is average."
      6.2 "62% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 5.2 "Average cleanliness."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      2.6 "74% complained about the bathroom."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      3.8 "62% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "86% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.4 "96% found problems with the furniture."
      3.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 63%."
      4.7 "53% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.3 "87% had problems with the shower."
      2.3 "77% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.8 "62% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.7 "Not very comfortable."
      3.8 "62% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "77% thought it was too noisy."
      3.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 63%."
      3.8 "62% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 2.2 "Terrible amenities."
      2.2 "78% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.0 "80% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 0.8 "Horrible vibe."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention

    Map

    Map

    Close