Overview

Apartamentos Sercotel Eurobuilding 2

69, Orense Street, 28020 Madrid, Madrid, Spain
+34 911 549 060

₹ 3,642+

Overall guest ratings

6.6/10 Good
based on 751 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.8
  • 6.6
  • 4.3
  • 4.0

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Apartamentos Sercotel Eurobuilding 2 features a rooftop terrace and puts you within a 15-minute walk of Santiago Bernabeu Stadium. Guests can splash around at the outdoor pool or grab a bite to eat at the restaurant. A seasonal outdoor pool and a garden are offered, and in-room conveniences include refrigerators and microwaves.

    Less more
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Business centre
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Internet
    • Wi-Fi
    • Laundry service
    • Room service
    • Outdoor pool
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Air-conditioned
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • ATM on-site
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry facilities
    • Restaurant
    • Cable or satellite TV
    • Coffee shop
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Kitchen/Kitchenette
    • Safe
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 751 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 6.6 "Service is ok."
      5.0 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 50%."
      6.0 "Only 60% thought the service was professional."
    • 5.0 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
      1.7 "83% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      3.1 "69% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% found problems with the furniture."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.7 "63% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      3.4 "66% had problems with the shower."
      2.5 "75% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      4.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 60%."
      3.1 "69% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.0 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.5 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      2.7 "73% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.8 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      1.8 "82% thought it was rather dirty."
      3.1 "69% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 300 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 6.6 "Service is ok."
      6.8 "68% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 5.4 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
      1.7 "83% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.8 "92% found problems with the furniture."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      3.4 "66% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
    • 3.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      2.3 "77% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.7 "Fair terrace, said 53%."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.6 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.4 "86% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.1 "Horrible vibe."
      0.4 "96% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.4 Good
    based on 172 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
    • 6.3 "Service is ok."
    • 4.6 "Pool is below average."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
      1.8 "82% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.9 "91% found problems with the furniture."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were dirty."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 2.5 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were dirty."
    • 1.7 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.1 "89% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 277 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
    • 6.5 "Service is ok."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      1.8 "82% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      0.7 "93% found problems with the furniture."
      4.3 "57% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
      3.4 "66% had problems with the shower."
      4.0 "60% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
    • 3.5 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 2.7 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.7 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.6 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.3 "87% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    more

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close