Overview
×
Your browser will soon be unsupported by KAYAK.
Update now and keep on travelling with us!

Macia Gran Lar

Pz Carmen Benitez 3, 41003 Sevilla, Andalucia, Spain
+34 954 410 361

₹ 2,859+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
based on 1,988 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.8
  • 6.5
  • 4.9
  • 4.3

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in Seville (Nervion), Macia Gran Lar is minutes from San Esteban Church and Pilate's House. This 4-star hotel is close to Alcazar and Seville Cathedral.

    Rooms

    Make yourself at home in one of the 137 air-conditioned rooms featuring minibars. Complimentary wireless Internet access keeps you connected, and satellite programming is available for your entertainment. Private bathrooms with bathtubs feature bidets and hair dryers. Conveniences include safes and desks, and housekeeping is provided daily.

    Amenities

    Make use of convenient amenities, which include complimentary wireless Internet access and concierge services.

    Dining

    Enjoy a meal at a restaurant, or stay in and take advantage of the hotel's room service (during limited hours). Quench your thirst with your favorite drink at a bar/lounge. Buffet breakfasts are available for a fee.

    Business, Other Amenities

    Featured amenities include a computer station, dry cleaning/laundry services, and a 24-hour front desk. Self parking (subject to charges) is available onsite.

    Less more
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Car hire
    • Internet
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Room service
    • Bicycle hire
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 hour front desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Business centre
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry facilities
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Cable or satellite TV
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 1,988 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      8.7 "City centre within easy reach, said 87%."
      9.6 "96% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.6 "96% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 6.5 "Service is ok."
      6.6 "66% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 6.3 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.9 "Not very comfortable."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.1 "69% thought it was too noisy."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
    • 4.3 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      3.2 "68% complained about the bathroom."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.9 "For 91%, the rooms looked old."
      1.7 "83% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.9 "71% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.9 "91% found problems with the furniture."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
      1.1 "89% had problems with the shower."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.8 "72% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.7 "93% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.7 "73% said the wifi quality was bad."
      3.3 "67% thought it was overpriced."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 1,232 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      8.9 "City centre within easy reach, said 89%."
      9.6 "96% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 100%."
      9.6 "96% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 6.7 "Service is ok."
      6.0 "60% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 4.8 "Not very comfortable."
      4.0 "60% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.2 "68% thought it was too noisy."
      2.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 75%."
    • 3.6 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      4.0 "60% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      3.1 "69% complained about the bathroom."
      2.1 "79% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.8 "92% found problems with the furniture."
      2.6 "74% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 75%."
      1.1 "89% had problems with the shower."
    • 2.7 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.8 "92% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.7 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 258 reviews
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      8.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 80%."
      9.7 "97% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 6.3 "Service is ok."
    • 6.2 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.9 "Average comfort."
    • 5.1 "Rooms are ok."
      6.3 "Only 63% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 2.9 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 1.0 "Horrible vibe."
      0.4 "96% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 497 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      8.9 "City centre within easy reach, said 89%."
      9.3 "93% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 6.5 "Service is ok."
      6.6 "66% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 6.0 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.3 "Not very comfortable."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.9 "71% thought it was too noisy."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
    • 3.9 "Rooms are not good."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.9 "For 91%, the rooms looked old."
      2.6 "74% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.9 "91% found problems with the furniture."
      1.7 "83% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
      1.2 "88% had problems with the shower."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.2 "Horrible vibe."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.0 "70% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    more

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close