Overview

Massili'Appart Vieux Port

4 Rue Coutellerie, 13002 Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur, France
+33 4 91 31 89 10

₹ 4,377+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
based on 1,058 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.8
  • 8.6
  • 3.8
  • 3.2

Good to know

  • Wonderful sightseeing

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in 2nd Arrondissement, this aparthotel is within a 15-minute walk of Musee d'Histoire de Marseille, La Vieille Charite, and Museum of Civilizations in Europe and the Mediterranean. Notre-Dame de la Garde is 1.1 mi (1.8 km) away.

    Less show all
    Expedia

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • No smoking
    • Air-conditioned
    • Laundry service
    • Safe
    • Laundry facilities
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Kitchen/Kitchenette
    • Free Internet
    • Storage available
    • Terrace/Patio
    Less show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    All reviews

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 1,058 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 8.6 "Bar is amazing."
    • 6.0 "Service is ok."
      6.4 "64% said the reception staff was ok."
      6.0 "60% thought the management was tolerable."
    • 3.8 "Not very clean."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.3 "Unclean dining area, according to 87%."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      1.9 "81% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      1.0 "90% found problems with the furniture."
      2.2 "78% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      1.1 "89% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      1.3 "87% were unhappy with the view."
      2.9 "71% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.7 "93% didn't like the architecture."
      1.0 "90% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.8 "Food is inedible."
      0.9 "For 91%, the dining experience was not enjoyable."
      0.0 "100% did not enjoy the desserts."
      1.3 "Unclean dining area, according to 87%."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 529 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 6.1 "Service is ok."
      6.7 "67% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 3.9 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      1.9 "81% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      2.4 "76% complained about the bathroom."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.9 "91% found problems with the furniture."
      2.3 "77% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      1.1 "89% were unhappy with the view."
      1.9 "81% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 68%."
    • 2.8 "Food is inedible."
    • 2.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.6 "Terrible amenities."
      2.6 "74% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    based on 211 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 6.3 "Service is ok."
      6.5 "65% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 3.8 "Not very clean."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.4 "56% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      2.4 "76% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      1.0 "90% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.4 "76% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.0 "Horrible vibe."
      4.7 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 53%."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.0 OK
    based on 10 reviews
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 306 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 6.0 "Service is ok."
      6.6 "66% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 4.1 "Not very clean."
      3.7 "63% said rooms were dirty."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
      1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.7 "63% said rooms were dirty."
      1.1 "89% found problems with the furniture."
      5.0 "Beds were acceptable for 50%."
      2.1 "79% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      1.0 "90% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.2 "Food is inedible."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Good to know
    "Wonderful sightseeing"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    All reviews
    Find reviews that mention:
    Photos
    Map

    Map