Overview

Central Park Hotel

3-15 Wilberforce Road, London, N4 2SN, United Kingdom
+44 207 354 5850

₹ 3,445+

Overall guest ratings

5.8/10 OK
based on 1,791 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.3
  • 4.5
  • 3.9
  • 3.9

Nearby

    show all

    About

    When you stay at Central Park Hotel, you'll be within a 15-minute drive of London Zoo and Emirates Stadium. You can unwind with a drink at the bar/lounge, and free continental breakfast is available daily. Rooms offer flat-screen TVs and free WiFi.

    Less more
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Designated smoking area
    • Storage available
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Cable or satellite TV
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less more
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    5.8 OK
    based on 1,791 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      7.2 "Great parking, according to 72%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.7 "87% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      8.5 "Easily accessible by car, said 85%."
    • 4.5 "Service is below average."
      3.3 "67% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      2.5 "Bad housekeeping, according to 75%."
      2.2 "78% didn't like the management."
    • 3.9 "Not very clean."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      3.5 "65% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.3 "77% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.9 "Rooms are not good."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
      3.5 "65% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.6 "84% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.4 "66% found problems with the furniture."
      3.2 "For 68%, the rooms looked old."
      3.0 "70% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
      3.1 "69% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.9 "Awful breakfast."

    Overall rating

    6.0 OK
    based on 680 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
      7.3 "Great parking, according to 73%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 4.6 "Service is below average."
      3.6 "64% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      2.7 "Bad housekeeping, according to 73%."
    • 4.1 "Not very clean."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were dirty."
      3.9 "61% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.1 "79% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
      3.1 "69% complained about the bathroom."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.8 "62% said rooms were small."
      1.5 "85% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.4 "For 66%, the rooms looked old."
      3.9 "61% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.4 "66% found problems with the furniture."
      3.1 "69% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.4 "Internet is poor."
      3.0 "70% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.7 "Awful breakfast."

    Overall rating

    5.7 OK
    based on 949 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      9.7 "Near to public transport, according to 97%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      7.4 "Great parking, according to 74%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.2 "82% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 4.3 "Service is below average."
      3.3 "67% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      2.1 "Bad housekeeping, according to 79%."
    • 3.9 "Rooms are not good."
      3.2 "68% complained about the bathroom."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were small."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.6 "64% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.2 "68% found problems with the furniture."
      1.6 "84% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.2 "For 68%, the rooms looked old."
      2.6 "74% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.8 "Not very clean."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      3.6 "64% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.6 "74% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.6 "Internet is poor."
      3.3 "67% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.8 "Awful breakfast."

    Overall rating

    5.8 OK
    based on 161 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
    • 4.6 "Service is below average."
      3.7 "63% indicated the reception staff was not good."
    • 4.2 "Not very clean."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
      2.3 "77% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were small."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
      3.1 "69% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.7 "Awful breakfast."
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    more
    more

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close