Overview

Beijing Maple Hotel (Jiuxianqiao)

5 Jiangtai Road (Jiangtai Lu), Beijing 100016, China
+86 106 432 2288

₹ 2,063+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
based on 2,404 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.4
  • 9.1
  • 4.4
  • 3.7

Nearby

    show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 2,404 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 97%."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Business sites within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 9.1 "Excellent value."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      8.5 "85% thought the service was very professional."
      8.5 "85% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.4 "Not very clean."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were dirty."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.7 "63% thought it was rather dirty."
      0.0 "Unclean dining area, according to 100%."
    • 3.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      2.1 "79% complained about the bathroom."
      4.7 "53% said rooms were dirty."
      3.8 "62% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      1.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 87%."
      3.8 "62% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.6 "94% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.5 "65% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.0 "100% had problems with the shower."
      3.6 "64% found problems with the furniture."
      1.4 "86% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
    • 2.1 "Terrible amenities."
      2.1 "79% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      4.3 "57% complained about the elevator."
    • 1.7 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.6 "84% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 216 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
    • 8.9 "Good value."
    • 7.7 "Good service."
    • 4.1 "Not very clean."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.1 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      1.9 "81% complained about the bathroom."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.8 "62% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were small."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.6 "74% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 72 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
    • 3.5 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."

    Overall rating

    7.1 Good
    based on 1,610 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Business sites within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 9.2 "Excellent value."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      8.5 "85% thought the service was very professional."
      8.7 "87% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 7.1 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.6 "Not very clean."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.4 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      1.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 88%."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.6 "94% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 3.2 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      1.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 88%."
      4.1 "59% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.3 Good
    based on 504 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
    • 8.9 "Good value."
    • 7.2 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.1 "Good service."
    • 3.8 "Not very clean."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were small."
    • 2.8 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.7 "83% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.6 "Terrible amenities."
      1.6 "84% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Economy Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for budget travelers.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:

    Map

    Map